Service Overview
Modern enterprise environments — spanning cloud platforms, remote workforces, SaaS applications, and interconnected supply chains — have rendered perimeter-based security models obsolete. Zero Trust is not a product; it is an architectural philosophy that requires structured assessment, deliberate design, and disciplined execution across identity, access, and network layers.
Our Zero Trust Architecture & Identity Strategy Assessment provides a rigorous evaluation of your current security posture against Zero Trust principles. We review your identity infrastructure, access governance model, network segmentation, and policy frameworks — identifying gaps, misalignments, and high-priority remediation opportunities across the entire trust model.
The output is a clear architectural roadmap: practical, phased, and aligned to your business operations. We help you move toward Zero Trust without disrupting the access experience your workforce depends on.
- Establish your Zero Trust maturity baseline
- Identify implicit trust relationships and over-privileged access paths
- Design an actionable, phased ZT architecture roadmap
Key Assessment Areas
Identity Governance Review
Assessment of identity lifecycle management, directory architecture, federation configurations, and orphaned account exposure.
Multi-Factor Authentication Coverage
Evaluation of MFA deployment breadth, policy enforcement strength, and bypass risk across user populations and access paths.
Privileged Access Controls
Review of privileged account governance, just-in-time access controls, session monitoring, and credential vaulting maturity.
Micro-Segmentation & Network Controls
Analysis of network segmentation architecture, lateral movement exposure, and alignment with ZT network access principles.
Conditional Access Policy Review
Assessment of conditional access rules, policy logic, device compliance enforcement, and context-aware access control maturity.
Zero Trust Maturity Scoring
Structured maturity scoring across ZT pillars — Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications, Data, and Visibility — against CISA ZTMM.
Challenges We Help Solve
- Excessive privileged access granted to users, admins, and service accounts
- Implicit network trust allowing lateral movement after initial compromise
- Weak or inconsistently enforced MFA across critical systems and SaaS applications
- No conditional access controls based on device posture or location context
- Identity sprawl with orphaned accounts, excessive permissions, and shadow admin paths
- Poor visibility into access activity and no behavioural anomaly detection
- Inability to demonstrate Zero Trust alignment to auditors or leadership
- Federated identity misconfigurations creating cross-tenant trust exploitation risk
Assessment Methodology
-
01 Discovery & Scoping Stakeholder alignment, asset scoping, identity system inventory
-
02 Architecture Review Current-state ZT posture against CISA ZTMM pillars
-
03 Identity & Access Assessment IAM, PAM, MFA, conditional access, and directory review
-
04 Network & Segmentation Review Lateral movement exposure, trust boundary analysis
-
05 Risk & Gap Analysis Prioritized gap register mapped to business risk impact
-
06 Roadmap & Reporting Phased ZT roadmap, executive summary, technical findings
Frameworks & Standards Alignment
Deliverables
- Zero Trust Maturity Assessment Report
- Identity & Access Risk Register
- Architecture Gap Analysis (Current vs. Target State)
- Privileged Access Governance Review
- Prioritised Remediation Roadmap (Phased)
- Executive Summary with Security Maturity Score
- Conditional Access Policy Review Findings
- Technical Findings Workbook
Business Benefits & Outcomes
- Measurable reduction in lateral movement risk through trust boundary redesign
- Stronger identity governance — fewer orphaned accounts, less permission sprawl
- Demonstrable Zero Trust progress for board, audit committee, and regulatory reporting
- Improved ransomware resilience through segmentation and privileged access controls
- Reduced attack surface for credential-based intrusions and insider threats
- Phased roadmap enabling Zero Trust adoption without operational disruption
- Alignment with cyber insurance requirements and regulatory compliance frameworks
Industries We Support
Why Choose QMet Digital
Architecture-First Thinking
We assess and design ZT as an architectural transformation, not a product deployment exercise.
Vendor-Neutral Assessments
Our findings are based on your risk posture, not vendor affiliations or tool preferences.
CISA ZTMM Aligned
Assessments structured around the authoritative Zero Trust Maturity Model for defensible benchmarking.
Operational Practicality
Roadmaps are phased for business continuity — Zero Trust without disrupting workforce access.
Business-Aligned Security Strategy
We translate ZT findings into business risk language for executive and board audiences.
End-to-End Expertise
From identity governance and PAM to network segmentation and policy — full ZT pillar coverage.
Related Security Services
Identify Your Zero Trust Gaps Before Attackers Do
Our Zero Trust specialists deliver structured, CISA-aligned assessments with practical roadmaps — built for your environment, not a generic template.